There are several different approaches being developed for the production of synthetic hydrocarbon liquid fuels that could be used for non-electrified ground transport and aviation. Most use the Fischer Tropsch process to convert carbon monoxide and hydrogen into hydrocarbons, but with a variation on the source of carbon for the process.
It's worth noting that the output of the fischer tropsch process appears to be a mixture of products from petroleum liquids to gaseous products & ethane. The chemistry and detail of which is beyond my current understanding and research into this so far. An understanding of the different products would ideally be considered as part of a detailed industry model.
Most of the examples I found below used lower heating values (LHV) for input biomass and output fuels, but not all examples where explicit.
Notes from the ZeroCarbonBritain model
Direct method:
1 TWh Biomass -> 0.52 TWh Biofuel
Potential hydrogenation process:
1.0 kWh Biomass + 0.50 kWh Hydrogen → 1.30 kWh diesel 87% efficient
Previous background ZeroCarbonBritain research found a similar idealised fischer-tropsch process:
1.0 kWh Biomass + 0.47 kWh Hydrogen → 1.25 kWh biofuel 85% efficient
The ZeroCarbonBritain model uses an assumed less efficient process:
1.3 kWh Biomass + 0.61 kWh Hydrogen → 1.00 kWh biofuel 52% efficient
1.0 kWh Biomass + 0.47 kWh Hydrogen → 0.78 kWh biofuel
Including the electrolysis stage, 80% electrolysis efficiency assumed:
1.0 kWh Biomass + 0.59 kWh Electric → 0.78 kWh biofuel 49% efficient
Biomass source is woody biomass such as short rotation coppice.
Paper: Improving carbon efficiency and profitability of the biomass to liquid process with hydrogen from renewable power (M.Hillestad et al, December 2018) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236118313632#! This paper describes the combination of Fischer Tropsch Biomass to Liquid with the addition of hydrogen in detail and develops a detailed model of the process. The energy flow diagram from the paper to the right details the proposed performance: 1.0 kWh Biomass + 0.95 kWh Electric → 1.28 kWh FT products An overall efficiency of 65.6%. |
|
Neo Carbon Energy (Steam, CO2 and electricity to liquid fuels) Similarly NeoCarbonEnergy detail a process for the production of fisher tropsch liquid fuel using solid oxide electrolysis but in this case without the biomass carbon source. NeoCarbonEnergy uses a CO2 input instead: Presentation: Production of fisher tropsch liquid fuel using solid oxide electrolysis cells A SOEC produced Syngas (CO+H2) from inputs: steam, CO2 and electricity. The Syngas is converted to liquid fuels in a FT plant. Preliminary results suggest an electricity to fuel efficiency of 52.7% (LHV) without heat integration with 11.4 MW of electricity 0.74 kg/s of CO2 and 0.64 kg/s of water producing 6.0 MW of fuel (LHV). In the presentation they note that the process should theoretically yield an overall efficiency of 76.8% (LHV) with potential for further improvement above this figure towards 2030-2050. |
|
Gas to Liquids One possibility could be to use synthetic methane created via the sabatier process in a second stage Fischer-Tropsch gas to liquids conversion. The Shell Pearl GTL gas to liquids project may be an applicable technology process: 45,000,000 m3/day natural gas x 10.6 kWh/m3 = 477 GWh/day, is converted to: 22,000 m3/day petroleum liquids = 22M litres/day x 9.7 kWh/litre = 213.4 GWh/day and 120 kilo barrels of oil equivalent (730 TJ) of natural gas liquids and ethane = 203 GWh/day Output: 213.4 + 202.8 = 416.2 GWh/day, Input: 477 GWh/day It's important to note that only 51.2% of the output is petroleum liquids, the remainder is natural gas liquids and ethane. |
Sunfire Blue Crude (CO2 + Water + Electricity):
https://www.sunfire.de/en/company/news/detail/first-commercial-plant-for-the-production-of-blue-crude-planned-in-norway
"electric capacity of 20 megawatts, producing 8,000 tons of Blue Crude per year", I calculate 8000 tons/year to be equivalent to a continuous power of 11.5 MW, suggesting an energy efficiency of 57.5%
The Soletair process (CO2 + Water + Electricity):
https://soletair.fi/technical-specifications/phase-6-renewable-consumer-products
3167 kWh produces 100 kg/h of FT products, assuming 0.77 kg/litre suggests 130 litres/h with an energy content of 1261 kWh/h (9.7 kWh/litre)
Suggests an energy efficiency of ~40%.
Air fuel synthesis Ltd (CO2 + Water + Electricity):
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/40296/air-fuel-synthesispdf
1.6MW of power are required to make 1 tonne/day of AFS fuel. ~ 520 kW fuel = ~33% efficient
Audi E-diesel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-diesel
The Audi E-diesel plant in Dresden uses the Sunfire technology.
Sun to Liquid: Fuels from concentrated sunlight
http://www.solar-jet.aero now https://www.sun-to-liquid.eu
Aim to deliver direct concentrated solar to syngas efficiencies exceeding 30%.
Velocys Biorefinery
https://www.velocys.com/our-biorefineries-2
Wood gasification and fischer tropsch, landfill gas and gas to liquids fischer tropsch technology.
https://www.velocys.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/Velocys_UK_waste-to-jet-fuel_brochure_181128.pdf
Otherwise landfill waste is gasified to create syngas and then converted to jet fuel, diesel and naphtha via fischer tropsch.
Bio Based Maine
https://biobasedmaine.org/2019/02/renewable-jet-fuel-from-woody-biomass/
Woody biomass fermentation and catalytic conversion
UK Gov funding for synthetic aviation fuels, ongoing https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-funding-boost-for-low-carbon-fuels-development
Exergy analysis of a production process of Fischer-Tropsch fuels from biomass
http://www.oilcrisis.com/netenergy/woodfischertropsch.pdf
Results: For the standard process, the rational efficiency (defined as exergy content of the Fischer-Tropsch products divided by the exergy content of all input materials, heat and work) amounts to 51.2%. This can be subdivided between 38.5% for the liquids and 12.7% for the tail gases.
Process efficiency of biofuel production via gasification and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236113002019
The maximum overall process efficiency of 51%, of which 40% was in the form of Fischer–Tropsch liquids